Five Minutes with Ronald McCrum


February 24, 2017




This year marks the 75th anniversary of the Fall of Singapore. Considered one of the greatest defeats in the history of the British Army during World War Two, retired British Army Officer and military historian, Ronald McCrum, undertakes a close examination of the role and the responsibilities of the colonial authorities in his new book, The Men Who Lost Singapore, 1938-1942.

In this edition of Five Minutes With ..., we talk to Colonel McCrum to get his insights on how his military background helped his research, his history and ties with Southeast Asia, and whether co-ordination between civil authorities and military bodies has improved nearly eight decades on.

How did you come to be interested in the military history of this particular region?

My interest in military history was, I suppose, inevitable. At 18 years of age, I decided to become a soldier and at Sandhurst, the officer training college, part of the curriculum is military history and it fascinated me. In any case, it was now my chosen profession and I almost felt duty bound to understand something of the trials and tribulations of my predecessors.

The Far East, Malaya/Malaysia and Singapore were of particular interest because I spent a lot of my life in these parts. I first came to the area not long after the end of the war (1948/49?) - my father was then stationed in Nee Soon. We lived just outside Johor Bahru and I went to "English College" in Johor Bahru. After a period in England, we returned to Malaya, this time to Kuala Lumpur (KL) and I went to the Victoria Institution in KL. So the formative years of my life were in this part of the world.

In your book you discuss the various factors leading up to Singapore's downfall, particularly how the preparation and execution of British defence strategies were addled by the conflicting views, interests and priorities of the military and civil authorities. In what ways has your military experience allowed you to be more attuned to these issues?

In 1965, after I had been a commissioned officer in the British Army for a number of years, an opportunity arose to be seconded for a period to the Malaysia Armed Forces and I accepted. I was sent to the Malaysian Royal Military College at Sungei Besi just outside KL as an instructor. While in Malaysia my first two sons were born, the first shortly after we arrived and the second just before we returned to UK. And then surprisingly in 1970 after completing a year's course at the British senior officers Staff College I was sent to Singapore as the Assistant Defence Advisor to the British High Commissioner. Where I spent two and half very happy years and my third and last son was born there. All three boys have Southeast Asia in their blood.

You've pointed out the civil authorities were slow to recognise the impending threat of the Japanese invasion. Was this general across other European colonies in Southeast Asia, or was it particular to Singapore? Do you think issues of co-ordination between civil authorities and military bodies improved with the advent of new technologies and procedures of co-ordination today?

While in Malaysia/Singapore I was endlessly curious about how the British Forces were so easily beaten in 1941/42. And in my travels I took the chance to visit the scenes of the battles that took place. After much reading, I began to recognise that in those early days of a new form of mobile modern warfare no one escaped an enveloping invasion. Inclusive lessons of total war were quickly learnt in the West, but in the quiet backwater of South East Asia such a prospect seemed remote. Glaringly obvious afterwards was the need for a combined (civil and military) planning headquarters, with an overall supremo able to impose decisions. At that time the three military services had each their own HQ's in different locations in Singapore and the Governor was remote in Government House. Now, of course, a combined planning authority is normal, greatly helped, of course, by modern communications. I cannot think of a current example where the civil and military authorities do not work closely together towards a common aim. A good instance in the Far East, after the war, was the combined operations of all the authorities in Malaya planning the defeat of the communist terrorists during the Malayan Emergency.


McCrum in Israel, 1988
(Image credit: Ronald McCrum)

What also struck me as grossly negligent was the poor, indeed almost non-existent, liaison between the Colonial Office and the War Office in London. One was demanding increased production of tin and rubber and the other telling the military they had to employ local labour to prepare defences. The same labour that was required on the rubber estates and the tin mines. There were, of course, a number of other very important factors that played a crucial part in the defeat, but the authorities quarrelling on basic matters like this did not help.

What are your future plans? Are you thinking of writing another book?

I am well into researching another book. This time a biography of a significant British figure who played an important part during the Indian Mutiny of 1857.


McCrum in Singapore with an advance copy of his book
(Image credit: Pallavi Narayan)



* * * * * FROM THE V.I. ARCHIVES * * * * *






Ronald and his younger brother, Leonard were good athletes. Ronald broke the 1952
sports javelin record for Class III with a throw of 135 ft 8 in. The following year, the
brothers achieved first and third places respectively in that same event.





When the V.I. Cadet Corps was revived in 1953, Ronald McCrum was made a Platoon Sergeant,
a foreshadowing of his eventual future. All higher ranking officers were V.I. teachers.





Ronald McCrum's talents extended to the V.I. stage as well. He took the part of Sir Andrew
Aguecheek (extreme right) providing comic relief with the likes of Ananda Krishnan (second
from left, as Sir Toby Belch), and Chan Koon Yau (second from right, as Clown) in the 1954
V.I. production of Twelfth Night. [Ramon Navaratnam (extreme left) is Maria.]




Leonard McCrum, Under-17 champion, in his winning dive
at the 1953 Combined Schools Aquatic Meet





VI The V.I. Web Page